All thriller, no filler. Those who wear a lot of harnesses, whether its for mountain climbing or other sports, will appreciate the slight variation in pocket placement. Since all three are packable jackets, lets take a look at how they pack up and how small they get. As you can see, there are differences among the three, most notable in weight and fill. On that note, lets start with their hoods. Its worth noting that leaving any of these packable jackets in their compressed state for a long period is not recommended as it could potentially damage the fill and affect their loftiness in the long run. Interestingly, the hand pockets on the Micro Puff hand pockets are noticeably positioned higher than those on the Macro Puff and Nano Puff. Let's get into it. That all looks great on paper, but what does it actually mean for how each puffer jacket performs? One side is lined with soft fabric that feels good to lay your head against, and its relatively large size means better cushioning. The Micro Puffs light weight and raised pockets are great for those who want to maximize mobility and wear a harness. In summation, the Macro performs the best in retaining heat because of its size and weight. Down is generally regarded as the gold standard for jacket insulation. Miguel loves road trips and actively takes the scenic route to make things interesting. Theyre all from the same brand, designed to keep you warm in the winter, and they all look pretty similar. To get an idea of the technical differences between each jacket, we've collected some key specs in the chart below. On the opposite side of the spectrum, the Nano Puff will keep you the least warm because it has less fill than the rest. Patagonia Nano Puff vs. Macro Puff vs. Micro Puff | Which Packable Puffer Jacket Should You Get. As for similarities, all three use synthetic fill rather than down. When he's not behind the wheel with a trunk full of gear, you'll find him tinkering with a computer; a hobby he picked up while watching tech reviews starting at age 12. However, the Macro Puff's large compressed size isn't too big of a deal when you consider that it can be used as a travel pillow in a pinch. Once again, the Micro Puff sits in the middle, with a good balance of lightness and loftiness. Let's see what they are and which puffer jacket is best for your needs. In the same way, here we have three packable insulated jackets. That's expected of the heaviest puffer jacket here, and it certainly feels like it. Pack Hacker is reader-supported. It's so large, in fact, that it can fit an entire bike helmet underneath. The downside (pun intended) for animal lovers is that it's made from feathers, usually duck or goose. Because the Macro Puff is the biggest (and heaviest) of the three, it's understandably still the largest when compressed, followed by the Micro Puff and then the Nano Puff. This is great for cyclists who don't want to stuff anything between their helmet and head. The Macro Puff stands out here with its large hood. But if youre in a rush, heres a quick look at what each of them is best at. The Macro Puff has bigger sections of insulation, followed by the Micro Puff and then the very checkered Nano Puff. Verbier? This saves a tiny bit of weight and contributes to the Micro Puff being the most lightweight puffer jacket here. Both the Macro and Micro Puffs have two inner drop pockets where you can put a water bottle. To be more specific, theyre designed for temperatures around 20F to 50F (thats -6.67C to 10C), not sub-zero. Bear in mind were leveling the playing field a bit here by comparing the hooded versions of each. All three have a pair of hand pockets where you can stuff some everyday carry items like a smartphone and wallet. It's also worth noting that the baffle design (the grid-like stitching that covers the puffer jacket) differs between them. When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. Despite the similarities in looks, features, and even names, the Macro Puff, Micro Puff, and Nano Puff each excel in their own right. Lets move on to the other puffer jacket niceties offered. What works for us may not work for you. Meanwhile, the Macro and the Nano Puffs both have a chest pocket, though the latter's is inside rather than out. Sign up for the latest and greatest gear delivered right to your inbox. Niseko? Lastly, the Nanos small compressed size makes it a solid choice for travelers trying to maximize every square inch of packing space in their bag. Still, it's by no means ineffectiveits just that its siblings do a better job overall. Speaking of cinches, both the Macro Puff and Nano Puff have cinches at the hems and hoods, while the Micro Puff lacks them altogether. On the other hand, the hoods of the Micro Puff and Nano Puff do need to go under helmets. The thin and light design of the Nano Puff fits closer to the body, while the Macro Puff feels a lot loftier than the rest. Before we start talking about which puffer jacket is which and whats different between them, its important to manage your expectations. Patagonia thoughtfully designed the Macro Puffs hood to have a single-point adjustment via cinch located in the rear, which can take some getting used to. Whichever you choose, though, youre getting a puffer jacket thatll keep you warm. It's worth mentioning that we've noticed our Nano Puff has lost some of its loftiness over time, something that we've not seen on the Micro Puff (though we haven't used the Macro Puff for as long). Meanwhile, the Micro Puff sits in the middle in terms of retaining heat. The question is though, are you in Aspen? It also doesn't have a hoodless version at the time of writing, and the extra material contributes to weight. Next, let's talk about how each puffer jacket wears. The order goes Macro Puff > Micro Puff > Nano Puff in terms of the total number of pockets. All look similar in the postcards, but their differences are what defines your trip. Patagonia Nano Puff vs. Macro Puff vs. Micro Puff | A packable puffer jacket means less folding and fiddling when its time to pack up. Learn more. This baffle is what keeps the insulation in place, so thinner fill will require more stitching, hence the Nanos design. Fortunately, Patagonia's synthetic fills perform well as a replacement. This trio of insulated jackets from Patagonia look similar, but they have their differences. When it comes to keeping you warm, the Macro Puff performs the best among the three. You know how it goes: you imagine yourself at a ski resort, maybe a cup of hot chocolate in one hand while gazing out into the orange-draped snowy landscape. With names like Macro, Micro, and Nano, theyre even pretty similarly named, so which should you get? That said, we dont find it too cumbersome to adjust when we need to. These arent arctic-conquering puffer jackets by any meanstheyre geared towards casual users who might take them for the occasional trek through a slightly snowy trail or just to keep you warm in the cold airport terminal. This means that the pockets remain accessible even when youre wearing a harness (like a hip belt) or a waist pack. However, the three start to distinguish themselves when it comes to additional gear storage. You'll never see him consider a product without being armed with plenty of product research & testing first. Instead, the Micro Puff relies solely on elasticated edges along the hood and hem to keep things snug. Thats what were here to answer. All of that said, your mileage may vary on thermal performance since each user has a different body type and tolerance to cold. One of the most relatable head-scratching dilemmas is picking out a travel destination.